World-renowned designer Massimo Vignelli once said, “Out of thousands of typefaces, all we need are a few basic ones, and trash the rest”.
Some of Vignelli’s work:
– Corporate identity for American Airlines
– Graphics for United States National Park Service
– The subway map for the MTA New York City Transit Authority
Today we’ll explore the 6 classic typefaces that Vignelli believes are all that you’ll ever need for any project, ever.
Why Is Typography Important in Graphic Design (blog post): https://bit.ly/3pnTHWD
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro
1:17 Garamond
1:58 Bodoni
3:00 Century Expanded
3:40 Futura
4:56 Times Roman
5:40 Helvetica
–
Learn how to build custom websites with Webflow FAST:
https://bit.ly/WebflowWebclass2020
–
Find me on other social media platforms:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ransegall/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/ransegall
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ran-segal…
–
Gear & Book Recommendations: http://bit.ly/2ohFOuj
#webdesign #typography #graphicdesign #helvetica #futura
Thanks for watching the video!
source
Futura for life
Why is YouTube recommending me Design videos? I just searched how to do a thing on figma š
Great to know video, I plan to add them to my collection, it's not the kind of fonts I use thou coz I am more into modern fonts, but the Garamond and Bodoni fonts were an eye-opener for me.
What font is on your tshirt?
Less is more !
Roboto is a gem! The latest Roboto Sans looks sick in formal places!
@1:45 "I think it's default on Windows…" Unsubscribe. š
bruh why aint montserrat in the list? its such a useful font
Design is a way of identification if we all decided to use the same 6 fonts for everything, we should also use the same 6 design templates as well.
This is the most communist statement about design Iāve ever heard
This guy honestly couldn't have made a worst type history video if he wanted
Times New Roman is so overused by non-designers and like you said a ādefault fontā for a lot of programs, so I canāt bring myself to use it. The 2 examples you said were not Helvetica appeared to be forms Helvetica Condensed, but not sure on that one. Iām not sure if the Red Bull logo was Futura though – Iāll have to take a closer look at that one.
Doesnāt know much about typefaces. People, better read decent books about that or study design at a proper art school.
Wtf hahaha
There are a lot of fonts that just look almost exactly like some other font, so yeah, we don't really need them. I think making a new font is what designers do when they're looking for their next job—like whitling a stick or something, to pass the time.
How about for web designs? Any suggestions.
Wanna give a shout-out to my boy Arial
I love the existence of tens of millions fonts. I disagree with the backlash by stuffy old narrow minded designers no matter how successful they were. Thatās kinda like saying you can only use acoustic piano, Rhodes and Wurlitzer sounds on keyboards. Variety is the spice of life, please take your rules and break them!
Why. This is borderline click bait mate. No one agrees with any of these. Even futura is over done. Popular = boring af and overused. Refer to Cuberto for good font advice.
I love Noto font b'coz font I in Noto not look l.
My company says otherwise.
You need a de-esser
That's some basic shit, right there.
Futura is the only one on that list I still use. Otherwise, I'll create my own or look for whatever fits the current project from the output of the myriad designers out there who are way more talented than Granpa Vignelli.
I think the point here isn't so much "NEVER use any fonts but these 6" but more an encouragement to designers who may be creatively paralyzed by the thousands of choices out there, as if to say "with a little discipline, look at the amazing variety of looks that can be achieved with only these 6 great faces!" Limited choices can be an incredible accelerant of creativity.
TY
So … for typesetting technical documentation, why have I settled on none of these, but Myriad? Not because it comes free with Illustrator. But because it has a huge character set (great for typesetting in different languages), four widths and four weights, is space-saving and more readable at small sizes than Helvetica. Anyway the overview misses at least one "Frutiger-style" sans serif. Why? Helvetica is problematic in difficult reading conditions with its closed shapes. All the different numerals forming more or less an oval. That "e" making almost a circle. Letters with very small openings. All those things making it less than ideal when it comes to readability in less than ideal reading conditions. In addition Helvetica was drawn at a time before systematic typefaces with many different widths were a thing. So it's a bit unsystematic. If it has to be "that sort of typeface" and I'm not trying to recreate a Helvetica, I'd always use Univers for its clean, cooler look …
This video was in my feed. Not subbed, but I thought I would give such an interestingly titled video a go.Ā
Yeah, going to stay unsubbedā¦