2022 is gonna be wild for developers…

How to like this video 100 times ?

"… and be compensated based on its reach. It would incentivize good journalism …" LOL

Can you make predictions that are NOT about the future?

Congratulations Mike, you created self writing software! Now get down to the mail room.
But I'm a 6 figures FANG Mr. Gates.
Well now your a minimum wage cart pusher. Security!!

"Hope is a good thing" 😉

Learn programming they said. You only need to learn html, css and javascript they said. Ok maybe some react, angular and vue they said learn some python they said. Now learn some web3, blockchain, metaverse and smart contracts they said.

Thanks for your thought on 2022. Things will change and it will be a great year for us.

I do love how metaverse and web3 are completely at odds and the opposite ends. And both are hated.

Rewarding news articles based on reach might incentivize better journalism, but it will most likely just incentivize clickbait.

Damn…..there's a lot.

Swear your videos are super inspiring and instructive. Thank you !

The moment @4:00 when you see a dude with an fpv google for drone flight(no power, data cable or antenna for the receiver attached), ripping with some nonchacku in the air, to display a metaverse experience. ROFL!
Made my day

you predict the last one wrong. I'm not in my computer screen neither the 60: of the viewers of this video

I think most people misunderstand metaverse. It's not supposed to be a video game or matrix. It is supposed to be a corporate work optimisation tool. It allows big companies to track behavior of ther employees, see what people spend most of their time on and use AI to optimise things. Mark is not a matrix fanboy, he is a businessman. Metaverse is a way of squeezing more money out of employees which is something big companies are willing to pay for. We are basically just perfecting worker abuse.

I'd like to raise the following issue with your web3 project idea: if we compensate anonymous reporters for their reach, what's to stop them from only reporting on what gets clicks? No one likes to hear about a genocides in African or eastern-European nations, nor do we like to hear about how our consumption habits affect impoverished nations/the environment, but it needs to be reported on. In respect to a lot of "web3" projects, its especially important to report on bad actors in that space, but many of the web3 consumers seem to not like to hear about it. A "decentralized" news media just kicks the can down the road.

Based on your video you convinced me that Web3 is bullshit

4:41 “When there’s a gold rush, sell shovels”. I didn’t know that one. Nice!

Frameworks is a carrot on a stick.

In my country publishers are rewarded by reach and they would make most bizarre or clickbait titles and photos just to get viewers attention, so I think it wouldn't be as good idea as you think.

Honestly, I'm betting more on federated open source platforms like Mastodon then blockchain. People will always want some form of centralization, and a way to give up responsibility, they just need to be able to give up that responsibility to someone they trust.

Bonus: Rust

tech bros are fucking tiring man how the fuck do you say all this shit without realising that the libertarian idealist web 3 is going to usher in an age of fucking hot garbage content.

Well If Metaverse blows and everyone uses it i am gonna leave the world and go to mars

"It would incentivise good journalism" 😀 nope it wouldn't. Do ratings for current mass media incentivise good journalism? The problem is not with propaganda and censorship. The issue is with the underlying motivation. Hype-seeking journalism is as bad as propaganda. If I am incentivised by number of likes on youtube, I will focus on materials that give me more likes, not on what's important.

another tip for web devs out there: learn rust

I'm too stupid for this video

thanks for this information

I should code.

Pessimists sound smart, optimists make money
-Broker's comment on criticism against CDO's in 2008

Please that sequence about web3 is it from a film , if yes what is the name pleaaase ???

"A bunch of product we don't need"
True, lol

I realized that the secret to making a million is making better investment. I always tell myself you don't need that new Car or that vacation just yet and that mindset helps me make more money investing. For example last year I invested 70k in blue chip stocks and crypto ( with the help of my advisor of course ) and made about 380k , but guess what ? I put it back and traded with him again and now I'm rounding up close to a million. Delayed gratification always pays off. I will always suggest to newbie’s or old holders, Trade with an expert! It is truly easy, only requires your time and guide with a mentor like Edward Rowe. You can reach Edward via tele-gra:m : @EdwardRowe

the real AI wears #3 and dislikes talkin about practice.

Thank you for singlehandedly incresing my knowledge

Sheesh technology is changing fkin fast

had to check the speed mid video to make sure it was set to Normal.

Pretty legit forecast..on board

Why no one is talking about mcDonalds ?
Did you get sponsored by McDonald's, Jeff?:)🙂

People think crypto currencies will build web3 and then just ignore IPFS, and friends

You have a typo @ 10:04 "more suff you should know"

No, VR in quality is just fucking expensive.

this was high value content

Metaverse is a bad idea in my opinion, digital privacy is slowly dying every day.

Well done and informative video. Thanks!

Meta verse has listed IG and Whatsapp under what we are doing …. will dog gif's welcome me on my space station environment while voice messaging my gf lol

WoW VR is the way to go for metaversing

so we remove standardization and increase vulnerability to the crypto wallets in web 3.0?

the guy with the nunchuks at 4:00 is using FPV googles as VR headsets xDDD

I love how this video sloooooowly pulls away from my knowledge base. I go from nodding my head in agreement to… Well…. Just nodding my head.

The decentralisd new idea is interesting, but your interpretation of what would likely happen with it is (imo) quite idealistic.

I think what would be MOST likely to happen is that you'd agglomerate polarising views on most topics. What gets clicked in high number tends to be:

1 – Super cool stuff
2 – Super relevant/useful (but not too complex) stuff
3 – Stuff that confirms whatever you wanted to proove with your latest google search

I'm sure some good stuff would end up there, but I feel it would be likely to be swamped by more polarized/extremed/biased stuff, that gets lots of clicked. Kinda like reddit.